Hallelujah, the containers are on site!

I’d love to show you photos of all the angles of my new container house now it is on site, but the delightful thing is that most of it is hidden by the garden. Many of the pictures are of trees and shrubs with just a glimpse of container behind. You can see the whole house from the front where the view is, and it’s shown in the banner photo above.

Getting the containers into position while keeping a substantial garden intact was not a simple thing. I reckon I ended up with the best team in the business, both for the truck delivery and the crane. Adam’s team from Turner and Central Crane Services worked miracles to get the containers from the truck to the piers. Fifty tonne cranes don’t look that manoeuvrable but apparently they can turn tight corners quite well if they’re in the right hands, and this one inched it’s way off the driveway, down the little garden path, to a spot half way between the truck and the piers. I think I might be slightly oblivious to just how close we were to the maximum reach of the crane when it hefted the 6 tonne containers over the tree tops, but I’m happy to stay that way. Adam said not to worry they’d get it done, and they did.

Setting up the crane in soggy ground near a garden retaining wall.
The 50 tonne crane in position, with Adam from Turner and Central
Crane in mid-lift. This gives an idea of how much garden everyone was working around!

Jodi Thompson from J & K Heavy Towing and Transport did some seriously talented driving to reverse the 12m containers down to the bottom of my driveway, with very little room to manoeuvre. A couple of other drivers had visited my site to give me a quote and said it wasn’t possible. Not only was there a blind reverse turn from a very narrow street involved but to add a bit more of a challenge there is a small garden right next to the road, directly opposite my driveway, which was right in the area where the truck needed to swing around. The garden now has large semi-trailer tread marks within 2mm of it, but is otherwise unscathed.

The truck reversing into the driveway, neatly missing the neighbour’s garden bed by millimeters.
The truck at the end of the driveway with a container being lifted.

We just had the wettest March since 1975 and then the rain didn’t realise it was April for a while so it kept on going. Delivery day followed the first good break in the weather but the ground was still soft and it’s a good thing we waited as long as we did – the crane only just got back out with the help of a few well-placed solid timber sleepers. I have a bit of landscaping to do to fill in the deep furrows it left in the driveway and path, but that’s a small price to pay.

Lift off from the driveway – the truck pulled out to go and get the next container.
IMG_0634 (1)
A high lift over the trees.
The first container going into place on the piers.

I am totally chuffed to finally have my house structure tucked away on site, and I can’t wait to get stuck into the rest of the build. I’m also pleased I chose this build method as anything else would have had much more impact on the lovely garden block.

The real fun is about to begin and I am now finally free from dodgy container fabrication companies.

The first container in place, from behind showing the tree view through to the front.
Container Number 3 going on top.
A crane “dogman” with a fine sense of balance working on the roof of the first container.

If you read my last post, which was a frustrated vent about the performance of Port Shipping Containers, I have a relatively quick update for you. After some negotiation the Company Directors acknowledged they knew they were in breach of contract and didn’t care, they refused to release my containers until I paid in full. I offered several compromises including 10% payment after delivery (instead of the agreed 20% outlined in our contract), and a third party payment system where the final payment could be held independently until all parties were happy. Then I asked for payment by credit card, as that would give me a bit of protection via the visa charge back system if something was wrong. They said no to everything except payment by EFT, and decided to stay uncompromisingly unethical.

The company did a last quality check for me, where they picked up yet another mistake. We had actually picked this mistake up back in drawing stages and a correction had been identified then, but it was completely ignored during the build stage. They fixed it promptly this time, without arguing which was nice.

The view from the garden path right near the containers. They can’t be seen at all from the street.
The tree view from one side of the deck.

Then as a grand finale, as the one tarnish on an otherwise happy day of container delivery, Port had got the position of the bottom side rails wrong. This bit is rather important as the bottom side rails, along with the corner casts, are where the containers sit on the foundations. If they are not where they are supposed to be then the container might miss the foundations.

I checked the position measurements with Port when I was doing the foundations. Their measurements were way out, basically it looks like they didn’t check which type of bottom side rails the containers had and they gave me specs for the wrong type. So I now have a section where the side rail of one container is sitting only on an overhanging steel top plate not directly over a pier and it will have to be reinforced. The incompetence of their staff just never ends.

I am currently looking into whether it is worth the legal fees to try to recover some of my build costs from Port due to the extended delays, plus the cost of fixing the foundation. I’ll certainly be posting some reviews to give people fair warning – if anyone is looking for a container fabrication company I strongly recommend you look elsewhere and find a company capable of using a tape measure, reading the supplied specifications, and sticking to their own contract.

Overall, apart from what is hopefully the very last stuff up by Port containers, it was a very fine day and a great outcome.

Container home companies – a polite and friendly review, considering..

I was going to title this post, “Container Home Companies – Zombies and Shonksters” but I figured that might have legal implications so I didn’t.

Firstly, I am still waiting on the engineering, but once that is done I will then have my Construction Certificate issued. The reason this last step has taken so long is that I had hoped the engineering would be done by the company that builds my house. Instead, after crazy delays and encounters with crazy people, I have given up on that and I figure engineering is engineering and whoever builds it will have to follow the engineer’s specs for steelwork, so I’m getting it done as a standalone. That way I can finish off the paperwork required by council.

I will now share my experience to date with container home companies.
In a few cases, it has not been pleasant, in fact it’s been a comedy of errors which I am sure will be funny one day. Until then I might drink.

Please note, for any lawyers out there, this is just my personal experience and my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect the experience that other people will have. No children or animals were harmed in the making of this post but the experience is not fictional and does represent real characters. Some of the language is creative but you have to have a sense of humour about these things, or otherwise curl up into the foetal position and wait for numbness to arrive.

Some of the behaviour by these companies is just frustrating, like the silent treatment and not ever answering emails or phone calls. Some of the behaviour is more serious, like being intentionally misleading;  two cases of this behaviour were both followed by a wonderful karma-type twist of fate, with the companies going bust soon after. Other companies have been OK and just weren’t the right fit for my type of build, but might suit others.

I will start with the two bigguns, the ones that take your hopes, and your time and money, and dash them against the rocks with a gleeful and unapologetic lack of ethics.

Number 1 – Nova Deko Modular. They fibbed.

They are Number 1 in a you-wouldn’t-want-to-meet-them-in-a-dark-alley kind of way. This is the original company I had 6 months of phone meetings with, getting input from them on the structural stuff including their standard wall structure, what was possible and what wasn’t, and the standard inclusions they provided for internal fittings. My DA was then submitted based on their standard building specs.

I noticed during the design development stage that their prices were rapidly going up, and I was told they were phasing out of doing custom builds and mine would be one of the last. So I kept checking with them if they could still do my build, if the price would be the same etc, and I was reassured that it had all been recently checked with the factory and with the MD and they would stick to their commitment, at least with a very close price. I did a triple check on that before submitting my DA.

After my DA went in, the guy I had been dealing with, Matt Chernishov, left the company. Before he left, he said we needed to get my build into a final agreement, which I heartily agreed with. The agreement was not in place before Matt left, although until the very day he left he assured me it was close, and copying in the factory manager and the MD he said of the MD  “You’re in good hands, Jim is a good man and will honour the original pricing the best he can.” Days after Matt left, Jim and the factory manager said they had no intention of building my house. They don’t do custom builds. No apology, no concern.

Soon after, the company closed its offices in Australia – they still operate overseas and you’ll find their website easily enough. If you want a simple build that is not a custom one then perhaps they are worth a try, but the lack of accountability and transparency within the company would bother me. If something goes wrong you might need an Italian friend to help sort it out. I have one of those but he’s not local unfortunately.

Jokes aside (memo to lawyers, that Sicilian threat idea was a joke) – a little honesty a little earlier would have saved me a lot of stress and time. Marks to Nova Deko Modular for customer service, zero.

As an aside, for anyone looking for a Mafia style threat I found this surprising website offering an online service  www.onlyinitaly.com/mafialetters

Marlon Brando the Godfather
Knowing someone like this might help in dealing with some of these companies. (Pic from here)

Number 2 – Rubix Modular. They asked me to fly to QLD, then fibbed.

I only found these guys recently, it looked like they’d had lots of positive media coverage and seemed reasonably solid, although none of these companies have been operating for very long given container house building is pretty new in Australia. I couldn’t find many negative reviews at the time, just one and that’s not bad these days. They used to sell Nova Deko Modular builds, but had troubles with them (which I related to) so they were doing their own home models nowadays.

It took a while to get an answer to my initial inquiry, but after one phone call finally got through they were keen and helpful. A few written quotes later and it was clear they hadn’t quite got their heads around my BAL FZ custom build, and suggested I go up to QLD and sit down with them to sort out the details (at my own cost of course). I booked flights for Tuesday last week, hired a car and day tripped up there and had a good meeting with a team of four of them including builders and Joshua Fisk the MD. It all seemed pretty positive. They had to go and check out a couple of details, said they would get the engineering sorted ASAP, and were keen to do the build. They showed me around the factory where some basic builds using insulated panels were under way, and it was good to see the size of two containers joined together.

They did act; within two days they had obtained a quote for my engineering and promised a full quote for the build by Friday. The next week (ie a few days ago), there were no answers to my phone calls and emails and I found a google review from this last week showing they are going into receivership and had to be out of the premises by last Friday. They would have known that was coming, but invited me up to QLD to lie to me in person anyway.

Seriously, how do these people sleep at night?
Or is that when they normally come out to feed?

I had a lucky escape, by the recent google reviews popping up now there are some people who have lost money or are stuck with dodgy containers that leak in the rain.

Number 3 – Price and Speed Containers. Please leave a message at the tone…

This one started out hopeful, just like all the rest when I stop and think about it. It turns out that all the movies are right and hope is a powerful thing. Mix it with some eternal optimism, some stubbornness, and a basically trusting nature and belief that most people don’t lie all the time, and the damn stuff can keep you going on, and on, and on.

This company is Sydney-based and they do container modifications. Mostly pop-ups like cafes and bars plus some temporary single-unit housing stuff, but they had a design on their website that was very similar to my house with the 3 x forty foot container layout and they had done it as a pop-up bar. So I thought it was worth asking what that model would cost and if they could modify it to build mine.

I thought they might just do the containers themselves, for me to then organise the internal fit-out but on inquiry staff member Joe Caruana said they can do internal walls and insulation, electricals, plumbing etc. His replies were fast, generally within 24 hours and quite helpful including discussions on cladding, transport and installation of the build, and getting the engineering done. Until I sent him my plans that is; then I received one more email saying thanks and they’d get back to me with a full quote, then all communications ceased. I left quite a few phone messages and emails over a few weeks, the last ones just asking for confirmation they were no longer interested in my build. No response.

Obviously they are no longer interested but apparently don’t have enough courtesy for a simple call, text or email to let me know. I guess if you’re not interested in the first place ignoring an email isn’t so bad, a few of us are probably guilty of that, but to be in mid-discussion and suddenly disappear is bit weird… maybe something happened and the night feeders above got Joe or something.

This lot could be worth a go if you want container modifications only. They could be perfectly nice people, who just need to work on their communication skills.

Number 4 – Container Build Group. Preparing for the Zombie Apocalypse

This is also a company that has done a lot of single-unit temporary housing and general container modifications, and is now getting into finished container houses. They have a bunch of multiple-module house designs on their website, some of which look pretty good. Overall their sales person was helpful and I’ve been in touch with them twice now, last year as a general inquiry and just recently to see if they could do my build now that Rubix Modular has proven to be a waste of time.

The main issue here is the cost. I sent my plans through, they said they remembered the design from last time and within an hour or so sent me a brief four line quote for a very large sum of money, not including the BAL FZ extras of cladding, decking, roof or even the internal stairs. It did include the 6mm toughened glass double glazing. At a per square meter cost the quote was around $2300/m, which is on the luxury-finish side of a traditional house build (if you believe that stairs between floors are beyond a luxury item and are actually a pure indulgence that doesn’t belong in the main costing).

They use insulated panels for the inside walls, which are based on colour bond steel so to hang a picture you’d need a rivet gun, and to attach something like a TV you’d need to know where you want to put it (forever) so they can insert a wall stud. They said the standard flooring included in their builds was laminate, not hardwood, and not gold plating.

Why anyone would pay that sort of money and be restricted by the dimensions of a container home I have no idea.

On further discussion, they said several things:

  • That building with containers was not actually cheaper, that the advantage was structural soundness compared to other methods. They can stack 9 high and last for decades at sea, so they are much stronger that other build methods.
    I’m not preparing for a zombie apocalypse so would be happy with a building that complies with BCA, I believe they tend to stand up OK for quite some time. It seems a bit crazy to build with containers based on that rationale alone, unless you’re in an earthquake zone or something. In my opinion the main attraction of this build method is that the structure is already there, in theory making it cheaper to build.
  • They make their money out of the internal fit-out. No kidding. I asked would they sit down and discuss different internal options to save on the budget? They said if I agreed to that price they would be happy to discuss it more. Huh?
  • Would they be interested in just doing the container modifications not the internal fit-out? No not really, they want a good finish inside that is done to their own specs for the photos, to help them build up a good reputation. I’m not quite sure how steel panel internal walls and plastic floors fit with that, but each to their own.
  • They did eventually say if I sent through all my other quotes they might try to come close, or I could make an offer and wait and see. They were very interested in who else was quoting and how much. Given they didn’t even give me an itemised quote to work from (so that I’m not quite sure what I get for that large amount of money),  I’m a bit reluctant to give them all that information on the competition as it doesn’t seem fair.
    They also said they do a lot of single-unit basic stuff, and at the other end of the scale they have some very big multiple-module jobs on with 11 containers or more, but nothing much in between and no factory space at the moment. They said it’s possible the builder over quoted me because he’s not really interested, and from my experience he wouldn’t be the first to do that.
Zombie apocalypse
Zombie Apocalypse. If you have a container house, it might well be the only thing still standing. But it will cost you. (Pic from here)

So if you want a single-module house, or have millions to spend on a massive build and don’t care about the per square meter cost but want something that would survive a zombie apocalypse on land or at sea, give them a go. Or maybe if factory space frees up later they might be interested, it could just be bad timing.

Number 5 – Cube Modular, the strong silent types

Based in Western Australia, I don’t have much info on these guys. To be fair to them it looks like they might only build their own designs and not do custom builds. I sent them an inquiry about a custom build, no response.

Others – oh please let there be others…

There are two more companies I am either in discussions with or about to contact again –  Container Domain Designs and Port Containers. I’ll keep you posted.


Feature image from here

DA is done, Happy New Year!

There will be a house. A stylish little two story shipping container house exactly where I want to put it on my gorgeous Flame Zoned block. YAAAYYYYY!!!

Little dance of joy.

The Development Application is approved, and will be in the post on Monday, or it’s ready for pick up if I get super keen and go and fetch it from the Council in Katoomba. That is very tempting.

There is of course a slightly longer story to it than that. I need to submit a bit more information for my Construction Certificate (CC) application, which was submitted at the same time as the DA and has mostly been assessed. All the queries on the sub-floor and roof structure were for the CC and most of the design has now been accepted. But I have to submit one more bit of information to get the CC, the custom engineering certification for the steel structure for my house, and I didn’t want to invest in that before the DA was issued. So the two were separated out. Anyway that’s all small fry, this build will happen!

Happy New Year!

Bending time like Beckham

I think every council is probably issued with a TARDIS.

When it comes to Development Applications, time just doesn’t follow any rules.

If you want to know about “the clock”, have a read of my previous blog post. If you want to know how to make time stand still, talk to council. If you’re not sure what a TARDIS is, well there’s nothing I can do to help you, you need to watch more TV

I never thought the DA would be easy, but I also didn’t think it would take quite this long. It’s not like I didn’t put some research into the thing. The delays are due to a combination of some fair requests for more information, followed by what seems like long and unnecessary delays. It also looks a little bit cheatsy and time-twisting on the part of the council.

The clock on my DA has still not been restarted. There were about 5 weeks in there where I submitted all the required information that had been requested, but the clock stayed mysteriously stopped. The reasons given for the delay were that council are very busy, overloaded with overdue DAs so mine was just not being looked at during most of that time.

That sounds sort of fair, but from what I have read the “clock” is supposed to give an idea of how long DAs actually take, and councils are obligated to make a decision in 40 days “on the clock”. The rules for this mysterious clock are up on this NSW LawLink site, which states that the clock should be restarted when the information requested by Council is provided by the applicant. So not restarting the clock when the information comes in appears to be messing with time, and only Time Lords should be able to do that.

Looking at the average time for DA’s to be fully considered I don’t think many councils actually make the 40 or 60 day limit, so maybe the clock is unrealistic. But if so, the clock is a source of false hope for people submitting DAs, and that’s just plain mean.

I have since had another request for more information and I submitted that just last Friday, and the clock for my DA is still looking stopped. It’s only three working days since I submitted the information, but I’m a bit paranoid as my clock seems to have been totally seized up since September. Time has not moved since then.

Through the roof

It took me the full 21 days to submit the requested information this time, as it involved redesigning the roof in my spare time, and I didn’t have much spare time.

The roof on my house, if my new design is accepted, will no longer involve magnesium oxide boards (MgO) with an FRL of at least 60/60/60, compliant for BAL Flame Zone. What new magical fire repellant material will it involve you may ask? Plywood. Yup, tongue and groove plywood. “But isn’t that less fire resistant?”, would be another good question. Yes it probably is.

Adding a layer of Colourbond steel to the roof, over the top of the MgO board, is not part of the fire-tested system. So there are apparently issues around adding another thermal load to the the MgO Board, and putting more holes in it to screw on the steel sheet. Those are fair concerns and I was asked to address them.

For the record, the Colourbond steel is used in several other fire-resistant BAL FZ roofing systems, has a low thermal load and is reflective so should reduce the amount of radiant heat reaching the MgO Board and therefore possibly improve the system. The MgO Boards are screwed onto frames anyway so the tested system includes perforations, and lots of them close together depending on what you are fitting the boards to (for example heaps more screws are used to clad structural beams than for wall cladding), so the number of perforations needed to attach the Colourbond would not exceed the number of perforations in their other tested systems.

However, I have had enough of this new BAL FZ frontier and am not going to be the one to try to convince council, RFS or anyone else that a combination of materials that has not been specifically tested should be OK for Flame Zone. The boxes on my DA need to be ticked, preferably quickly. To be fair, I also don’t expect council to stick their necks out and be the first to approve this system, given the high risk of fire in the Blue Mountains. So I found a different BAL FZ compliant roof system that uses Colourbond, timber frames, an Anticon insulation blanket and plywood, and I have put that on the roof instead. I have no doubt this system is not nearly as fire proof as MgO Board, but then I have 2mm corten steel and yet more insulation under that so it’s not going to be a cause for concern.

More pesky perforations

The other issue was the need for vents in the sub-floor, when the MgO Board system had not been tested with vents in it. So you shouldn’t have holes in the sub-floor due to fire risk, but you have to have holes for ventilation to comply with BCA. There is no reason why vents can’t be just the same as doors and windows, it’s not like this wall system is hole free over the entire house, so with the generous help and advice of local builder Frank from Mountaincraft Constructions we planned out a sub-floor that, we hope, should keep everyone happy.

Now that is all submitted, I am hoping that time might start to behave normally again very soon.






On the clock, tic tok..

Here is an update on my DA, for those with strong constitutions.

In the interests of honesty and forthrightness, which this blog is all about, I should note that my DA was rejected.


Yes, my DA was rejected by Council. “Holy bovine” I thought, that doesn’t happen much does it? What did I stuff up so majorly and how much will it cost me? The answers in the end were “often” and “nothing much”.

Apparently, according to those in the industry, in the old days if there was an issue with a drawing or two you’d get a call from Council and an opportunity to fix them up. These days the Councils are all “on the clock” to assess DAs, they are expected to process them within 40 days and each council is rated based on performance. That means it is now more likely the DA will be rejected; it then has to be fixed, and when it is resubmitted as a new application the clock starts again.

The fees paid on first application are held for 21 days and just transfer over to the new application so there is no additional cost in fees. The only cost in this case was fixing a few drawings, and a small risk of heart attack at the rejection news.

Why was it rejected? Well on good grounds apparently, but nothing too major. Memo to me, and anyone else taking on this sort of thing, car port elevations are required. I had included dimensions, model and materials, and location on the site plan, but that is not enough and front, rear and side elevation drawings are what is needed according to state regulations.

The other booboo was that the laundry was not shown on the floorplans. That was a small bone of contention as I had the laundry included on my own original floor plans, along with kitchen details, but both were omitted when the draftsman I hired did the final drawings. So I had to photoshop the final drawings and put the laundry back in.

So where are we at now? Well the DA was resubmitted within ten days of rejection, and the application was accepted this time. The clock was then stopped on the 10th September as Council wanted some details on how I was planning to use the loft outlined in my floor plans. I sent them the information within ten days again. Then I rang a week later to see if the clock had been restarted, but the assessor assigned to my DA was away for another week. When he got back he returned my call and left a message to say he had received my information and would look at it.

I just looked at the Council DA tracker site today (21st October), which is a very handy thing where you can track the progress of your application online, and it looks like the clock is still stuck. There is a little green line showing that the clock was stopped back in early September, and the line currently seems to continue to infinity. I don’t like that little line.

I have no idea why the clock appears to be jammed, I haven’t received any more questions from Council. So there is a mystery block of four weeks where time appears to have stood still, which I’m hoping to get more information on soon.

I’ll let you know when I have more news.

(Blog feature pic, of the old clock that’s not moving anymore, was taken from here)